Radicore Forum: XML+XSL matters » xsl transformation slow

Home » RADICORE development » XML+XSL matters » xsl transformation slow

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: xsl transformation slow [message #699 is a reply to message #698]

Mon, 19 March 2007 10:56

AJM
Messages: 2398
Registered: April 2006
Location: Surrey, UK

Senior Member

I cannot guarantee that a table name will always be directly under the root node. In a parent/child relationship the child table is under the parent node and not the root node.

Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		xsl transformation slow By: semcycle on Wed, 20 September 2006 16:49
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: AJM on Wed, 20 September 2006 18:19
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Sun, 18 March 2007 22:18
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Mon, 19 March 2007 01:13
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Mon, 19 March 2007 01:59
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Mon, 19 March 2007 03:25
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: AJM on Mon, 19 March 2007 05:20
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Mon, 19 March 2007 10:28
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: AJM on Mon, 19 March 2007 10:56
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Mon, 19 March 2007 05:25
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Mon, 19 March 2007 10:58
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Mon, 19 March 2007 11:18
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: AJM on Mon, 19 March 2007 11:42
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: AJM on Fri, 23 March 2007 10:17
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: braingeyser on Fri, 23 March 2007 18:55
		Re: xsl transformation slow By: AJM on Fri, 23 March 2007 19:50

Previous Topic:	Hide some screen elements?
Next Topic:	Change XSLT based on role

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Nov 13 20:08:48 EST 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01525 seconds